December 21, 2010Introduction![]() John Sotomayor/The New York Times November 1980: Riders protesting Mayor Koch's decision to give up on the bicycle lanes he had earlier embraced. As new bicycle lanes appear all over New York City, the opposition to them has become more vocal. City officials and cycling advocates say that the expanded network has already proved successful, increasing riders' safety while promoting a greener means of urban transportation. Opponents complain about the loss of parking and unloading space, as well as constricted traffic. They hope the lanes go the way of the ones in the early 1980's, though former Mayor Edward Koch, who oversaw their brief life back then, said that this time they might succeed because the city is putting far more investment into making them work. Source: NY Times Better Ways to Help Bike TransitUpdated December 22, 2010, 03:15 PM Alex Marshall is the transportation columnist for Governing Magazine and the author of "How Cities Work: Suburbs, Sprawl and the Roads Not Taken." He is also a senior fellow at the Regional Plan Association. Here’s what the city can do to get more cyclists using those new bike lanes and out onto city streets in general. Change the legal relationship between pedestrians, cyclists and drivers. In boating, the slowest, smallest vessel has priority, generally speaking. Thus the motorboater looks out first for the sailboater, not the other way around. If drivers knew their insurance rates would go up if they hit a cyclist, they would be more cautious. Something similar should happen here. Although the passage of “Elle’s law” helped, right now, when a driver hits a cyclist or a pedestrian, there is still no presumption of fault, even if just for liability purposes. That should change. If drivers knew their insurance companies would raise their rates or cancel their policies if they hit a cyclist or pedestrian, they would be more cautious when turning onto a crosswalk or opening a car door. Right now, more people don’t bicycle because it’s simply still too dangerous, even with bike lanes. From my studies of the Netherlands and other bike-saturated places, it is the proper arrangement of these legal lines that is even more important than the painted lines on the streets marking a bike lane. Return many of the city’s avenues and streets to being two-way again, as most of them used to be before World War II. Despite what the traffic engineers say, a two-way street is a safer street, one that is more navigable to walker and cyclists – and drivers for that matter. Now a cyclist must often travel around his elbow to get to his thumb – or cycle the wrong way on a one-way street, which endangers everyone. Sometimes the city, as with Kent Avenue, in Brooklyn, has converted a two-way street to a one-way street to put in a bike lane. This should stop. Promote biking on regular streets, and thus avoid “ghettoizing” cyclists into bike lanes. One problem now is that the bike lanes are usually put on larger streets and avenues, which means that cyclists are mixing with higher speed traffic and higher volumes of traffic. One solution is to make clear that bikes are appropriate on most city streets, even those without bike lanes. Start an annual fashion award for the best-dressed man or woman on a bike. One of the best trends in the city is the high-heeled, flowery-dressed woman or tweed-suited man making their way by bicycle through the city. It’s harder to drive like a maniac when you’re behind one of them. I’m not surprised there has been a backlash against the city’s bike promotion efforts. To every revolution there is a counter-revolution, and attempts to return to the status quo ante. And cyclists are fighting for a chunk of that most valuable of New York City real estate, its streets. Of course it doesn’t come easy. But the bottom line is that more cycling is a key route to having a healthier, saner and more livable city. Source: NY TimesRelated articles: Video: Biking the Streets of New York City |
Sustainability.org.il > תחבורת אופניים >